Neurodivergence, autism and the appropriate adult safeguard in police custody
Main Article Content
Keywords
autism, neurodivergence, appropriate adults, vulnerability, police custody, fairness, safeguards, criminal process
Abstract
Neurodivergent suspects and defendants may be disadvantaged by the processes and procedures within the criminal justice system. Whilst these disadvantages may emerge at any point, they are particularly pertinent during detention in police custody. The various processes and procedures that suspects are subjected to, in combination with the critical nature of the investigative stage of the criminal process, may be destabilising or detrimental to the interests of the neurodivergent suspect. Focusing on autism, this article examines the difficulties that autistic individuals may face and the ways in which their ‘vulnerability’ may emerge when engaging with the criminal process. Examining the appropriate adult – a procedural safeguard in police custody – and its implementation, this article provides a robust analysis of the problems faced by autistic suspects, drawing upon, inter alia, empirical research. It also provides suggestions for law, policy and practice, serving as a catalyst to critically reflect upon the safeguarding of neurodivergent suspects.