Crown act of state and detention in Afghanistan

Authors

  • Jane Rooney New York University and University of Bristol

Keywords:

act of state, detention, extraterritorial application of human rights, Afghanistan, Serdar Mohammed, Rahmatullah

Abstract

The Serdar Mohammed litigation signalled a decisive change in judicial attitude towards scrutiny of extraterritorial executive action in armed conflict. The most significant indicator of a change in judicial attitude was the reinstatement of the act of state doctrine in the private law claim in tort. Act of state bars tort claims against the Crown when the Crown acts outside of its territory. The UK Supreme Court characterised act of state as a non-justiciability doctrine. The article argues that the UK Supreme Court exercised extreme deference in its adjudication of the act of state in the private law claim. This deference was then mirrored in the reasoning employed in the public law claim under the Human Rights Act 1998, departing from international and domestic standards on detention in armed conflict.

Published

2020-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles